- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:38:24 +0900
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
Hi James, The HTML Working Group is using a bugzilla instance as its primary tracking tool for comments on the HTML5 spec and other deliverables of the group. So, if you would be amenable taking the same problem description and potential solution that you've outlined here, and raising it as a new bug in our bugzilla, that'd be the preferred way to get it on the radar for the editor, the group, and the chairs for the group. You can file a new bug here: http://w3.org/brief/MjA2 I think you probably have a bugzilla account already. But if you have any problems accessing it, or figuring out what your password is, please just let me know. Otherwise, if you'd rather not deal with getting it into bugzilla yourself, I can raise a new bug for it there myself, and link it to the copy of this message (and any subsequent thread) in our mail archives. --Mike James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, 2010-11-08 10:17 +0700: > The HTML5 <article> element seems potentially very useful, but there > seems to me to be an aspect of the overall design that makes it work > not quite as well as it might. [...] > One way round this might be a "nosection" boolean attribute on <body>, > which would say to the outline algorithm not to create a section for > the <body> element, and which would be valid only when the <body> > element consists of a single sectioning content element. -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 05:38:29 UTC