- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:06:18 +0200
- To: "T.J. Crowder" <tj@crowdersoftware.com>
- CC: Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>, Arthur Clifford <art@artspad.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Musgrove, Jason L" <J.L.Musgrove2@wlv.ac.uk>, public-html-comments@w3.org
On 10.04.2010 12:52, T.J. Crowder wrote: > Julian, > > > > For one thing, we're after last call, aren't we? > > No, we aren't. > > Thanks. Sorry, that was very sloppy terminology on my part, obviously > there are still a number of outstanding bugs/issues (per section 3 of > the last status report, "Getting to Last Call"). > > I should have said, or indeed asked, are we past last call for *new* > proposals? > ... Officially, no. > Apologies, I'm sure this is documented somewhere. I kicked around the > working group pages but I'm still relatively new to the working group's > page structure (and terminology). > ... You found the status report, which is probably the best summary of where we are. Going back to the proposal: similar proposals have been made in the past, and have been rejected back then (several reasons that come to mind: fallback behaviour, incompatibility with XML serialization), so I'd be really surprised for this to get new considerations unless better reasons than back then are presented (and sorry, I don't have a link to these discussions right now). Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 10 April 2010 11:07:03 UTC