Re: Alternate syntax for defining class attribute

Hi Jason,

The most recent proposal for this feature has the classes as part of the tag
> name.


No, again, if you go back and read my original and my reply to your earlier
comments (thanks again for those), the proposal does *not* have the classes
as part of the tag name. The proposal is that the dot be a terminator for
the tag name, just as space and > currently are.

-- T.J.


On 10 April 2010 08:44, Musgrove, Jason L <J.L.Musgrove2@wlv.ac.uk> wrote:

>    All,
>
>
>
> The most recent proposal for this feature has the classes as part of the
> tag name. If there is a space between the tag’s name and the class(es), as
> suggested by some, then most of my arguments no longer apply, and the
> backwards compatibility issues will simply lead to loss of styling, rather
> than unrecognised tags.
>
>
>
> -Jason
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Scanned by iCritical.
>
>
>