Re: rel="self", rev="made"

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:45:40 +0100, Frank Ellermann  
<hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> wrote:
> That wasn't what I meant when I wrote:  "I wonder why
> HTML5 doesn't adopt the (atom) rel='self'".  I missed
> rel="self", nothing is wrong with the rel="bookmark".

Oh, I don't know. I believe HTML5 doesn't have rel='via' either for  
instance. At some point this should probably be resolved as there's also  
the HTTP Link header which uses the HTML values.


>>> Your draft is IMO far too ambitious.  How about a
>>> "HTML 4.5" step cleaning up HTML 4.01 adding IRIs,
>>> with a corresponding text/html XHTML 1.0.5 ?
>
>> I don't think anyone has plans to work on that.
>
> Maybe you get back to "KISS" after "one giant leap"
> ended where it almost always ends... ;-)

We'll see.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Saturday, 26 January 2008 14:01:17 UTC