- From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:45:40 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: <public-html-comments@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > The point is that you asked why HTML 5 introduced > "bookmark" which would be a synonym for "self" that > Atom introduced. However, HTML 5 did not introduce > "bookmark", HTML 4 did, in 1999. That wasn't what I meant when I wrote: "I wonder why HTML5 doesn't adopt the (atom) rel='self'". I missed rel="self", nothing is wrong with the rel="bookmark". I use the latter on many of my pages, experimentally upgrading a few pages to rel="bookmark self" - after the "shortcut icon" business forced me to understand multi-relations. >> Your draft is IMO far too ambitious. How about a >> "HTML 4.5" step cleaning up HTML 4.01 adding IRIs, >> with a corresponding text/html XHTML 1.0.5 ? > I don't think anyone has plans to work on that. Maybe you get back to "KISS" after "one giant leap" ended where it almost always ends... ;-) Frank
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 16:45:30 UTC