- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:52:49 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 --- Comment #88 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to Anne from comment #87) > (In reply to Mark Watson from comment #86) > > given the high cost of such a requirement on content providers. > > I believe this is still under "citation needed". Clearly there are content > providers that have managed. With the evolution of HTTP and other new > platform features it also seems increasingly unlikely you can avoid the > requirement for any serious application. We are running some capacity tests and I will share some figures from those soon. Suffice to say, for the moment, that the costs associated with simply enabling HTTPS are very significant. A managed migration, at a reasonable pace with time for software and hardware optimizations to be developed and deployed, has a different, lower, cost. Also, HTTPS is not a panacea and we are looking at - and in some contexts have deployed - other approaches as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2014 14:52:51 UTC