- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:43:32 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27055 --- Comment #3 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to Sergey Konstantinov from comment #2) > As far as I understand, DRM systems have sophisticated license permissions, > such as: allowing local caching; allowing replays; limited license duration; > etc. It's quite possible that content providers will have different prices > for different licenses. > > So, we can imagine some malicious service which sells or re-sells content > under limited license to end-user, pretending that license is more capacious > than it really is; or some content provider which just "forgot" to mention > some severe restrictions. I see. Rather than a requirement for the UA to interpret the license directly, I think your suggestion is that exposing the restrictions to be applied by the CDM to the User Agent (and then to the user) would mitigate this form of fraud ? I don't think reliable detection of fraud this way is practicable or even very useful. The most this could provide would be earlier detection of the fraud i.e. when the license is provided rather than when the user attempts to exercise a right they have paid for and is denied. After that, the user has only the usual remedies for fraud. As to practicability, it is not at all obvious how one would distinguish fraud from legitimate cases where the license restrictions differ from the product restrictions. For example, in streaming services it is likely that a new license is granted each time the content is streamed, so then there is no connection between license restrictions and product restrictions. For download cases, one could imagine that a new license is required for each device on which the content is to be played, so then the 'single device' license restriction legitimately differs from the 'multi device' product. Whilst the product may contain a right to view the content in perpetuity, this may still be conditioned on obtaining a new restricted-lifetime license every so often. Finally, sites may use complex combinations of licenses with differing restrictions in order to deliver the end product to users. For example to show previews, trailers or to speed the startup of playback. Exposing this complexity to users is not unlikely to be useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2014 14:43:33 UTC