- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:29:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24641 Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: none Rationale: If it is a genuinely a good idea to use the @border attribute to indicate that a table is non-presentational, since the expectation is that table should never be presentational, then the only logical choice would be to make table elements that do not feature the @border attribute non-conforming. Arguing for a heuristic based on what is de facto an obsolete feature is one thing; changing said heuristic is another. Authors who wish to flag their non-presentational table as non-presentational are already wasting 10 characters; it does not seem particularly useful to help them save 3 of those. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 16:29:02 UTC