- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:23:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17673 --- Comment #42 from David Singer <singer@apple.com> --- Two comments in one. a) we get requests to expose in the MIME type string all sorts of information from the file. Does it have closed-captions in SEI format in the video stream? Are fragments limited to a maximum size? Are certain boxes present or absent? Does it use 64-bit variants of some features? Does it require support for some encryption formats? The 'codecs' string was introduced to answer questions about the codecs specifically, but can't answer all these others. However, it is possible to write specifications that set these requirements, and they can define a brand that goes in the ftyp/styp boxes, to indicate that the file claims compatibility, and those compatible brands can be listed in the MIME type (the 'profiles' parameter). We could keep loading specific features into the mime string for years, but I think it may be better to write these 'portmanteau' specs that roll up a whole bunch of stuff, and then label the file as conforming to those. We could even define such a profile and brand in the MSE spec itself. b) but, as noted in email today, the spec. rather bizarrely expects (requires?) that any ftyp/styp in the initialization segment be ignored, a statement that is currently causing some implementations to strip it, which defeats the purpose of these compatibility claims. <http://www.w3.org/mid/45F3418A-EBB1-461E-8580-4B9354E40BEC@apple.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 18:23:50 UTC