[Bug 24679] Addition and improvements to the table over (non-)layout table heuristics

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24679

--- Comment #7 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #6)
> What you say about table@sortable strikes me as *incredible* passive.
> 
> I would propose that you count this a evidence, now, that it is non-layout
> table usage, and remove that assertation from the spec if the authors starts
> to do it totally wrong.

hi leif, 
If something is not implemented I don't see why it should be added as a
suggested heuristic, you may think that passive, your opinion is noted.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 15 February 2014 19:45:38 UTC