- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:07:38 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24654 --- Comment #4 from alexander surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #2) > (In reply to alexander surkov from comment #1) > > layout table and role="presentation" table take different accessibility API > > mapping, at least in Firefox. I think implementation approaches are out of > > scope of this bug what means the change cannot be made out of UAIG context. > > Is it possible to tell more about what layout table maps to in Firefox? Or > may be you have a pointer to a documentation of what Firefox does? It is exposed as "layout-guess:true" object attribute, role="presentation" is exposed as UAIG requires > And is it > possible for the user to perceive any difference? technically, depending on AT implementation. > Even if layout tables without the role attribute are not mapped to > presentation role, ”maxime” number 2) said that ”layout table” designates > tables that, quote ”have - or could have had” role presentation. So there is > still, I think, room for a definition of the layout table concept with > reference to role="prsentatioN". Note, I'm not against that these cases should be mapped same way. My point is this change shouldn't be done out of UAIG context and browser implementations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 13:07:44 UTC