- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:32:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24027 David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|adrianba@microsoft.com |watsonm@netflix.com --- Comment #5 from David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> --- I have concerns about adding/requiring a hash. Some system designs might wish to generate the PSSH in an area that does not have access to the actual key. This might be especially true if the PSSH is generated on the frontend or in the application. It's also unclear how the CDM would use the hash. There is nothing in EME that requires that the key(s) be provided in the next response or all at once, though I guess some key systems might enforce that. There could also be ambiguity/complexity in dealing with cases involving multiple keys (request or license), especially when the number of keys in the license do not match the number of key IDs/hashes in the license request. Assigning to Mark to make a proposal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 19:32:30 UTC