- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:00:22 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24591 --- Comment #5 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> --- (In reply to Robin Berjon from comment #4) > I think Mike raises valid points here, and that we should go ahead with his > proposal. > > My only question is: can we just go ahead and make the change? There is a WG > decision, but it seems at odds with what's actually in the spec so I am > tempted to simply move ahead. "at odds with what's actually in the spec" can also mean that the specification does not correctly implement the decision. Alternately, there may now be new information that should cause the decision to be revisited. If so, I encourage that information to be presented as such. For best results, the new information should address the use cases that motivated the decision and/or presents new information that validates the claim that "rendering table borders by default is compatible with the Web" and/or identifies changes in user agent behavior since the decision was made that materially affects the decision. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 12:00:29 UTC