- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 22:21:36 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24405 --- Comment #9 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michael[tm] Smith from comment #8) > (In reply to steve faulkner from comment #7) > > Status: closed needs info > > Change Description: no change > > Rationale: There is no new information or rationale provided, when some does > > arise please feel free to re-open or file a new bug. > > (In reply to Edward O'Connor from comment #6) > > See this thread on www-style: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0621.html > > That thread seems like relevant info. At least Ted's reply there does - > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0634.html > > Specifically, it seems that in that thread, Leif is describing a case that > could possibly be addressed by using <main> multiple times within a single > document. > > So it would be useful to have an answer from the editors about whether or > not multiple <main> elements would be useful in the case described in that > thread. > > That said, it's true the OP (Georgio) has not responded yet to the question > in comment 3 in this bug, and it'd also be useful to have his answer too. hi mike, I answered ted on list http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0010.html but to reiterate here, main is not defined in html (W3C at least) as primarily a styling hook, it has a strong, specific and semantic meaning which is conveyed to users. For the use case described in the www-style thread a <div> is appropriate, its an element, essentially without meaning, to decorate visually, whatever bits of content one desires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 2 February 2014 22:21:38 UTC