- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 22:03:10 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 --- Comment #38 from Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com> --- Putting aside the dangers of CDMs running un-sandboxed code, I am not convinced that this change would result in much better privacy. This would secure network communications against man-in-the-middle snooping at the potential expense of usability on some browsers. But the information would still be provided to the origin that requested it. >From a practical point of view, getting you to visit my secure (but rogue) domain is much easier than getting between you and a legitimate server (secure or not). So if there were a "rogue" CDM that leaks an insecure permanent user identifier -- it could still do that. I think having guidelines for what UAs should watch out for before agreeing to include a potentially "rogue" CDM is a better approach. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 22:03:12 UTC