- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:43:52 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 --- Comment #37 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> --- (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #35) > (In reply to Glenn Adams from comment #31) > > Sure it does. And that is by design. CDMs are explicitly out of scope of EME. > > > That is a consequence of ruling that CDM details are out of scope of EME. > > That can't be helped. > > I think it is incorrect to say that all CDM details are out of scope. The kinds of details being discussed here are out of scope, i.e., sufficient details to perform a full security/privacy analysis. > > No and No. It will not improve the spec (and in fact will damage it). And No > > the WG will not revisit the decision that CDMs are out of scope. > > These are opinions It's not possible to make such absolute statements about > what the HTML WG might do. I just did (make such a statement). I predict it is true and will remain true. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 21:43:54 UTC