- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:19:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21341
Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark@w3.org
--- Comment #7 from Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org> ---
I believe the following quote from Plan 2014 [1] applies to this situation and
should clear up any doubt that longdesc should not be listed as obsolete:
> To prevent unnecessary confusion, the HTML5 specification will drop explicit
> indications that any given extension is obsolete once an extension specification
> exists that has been published as a FPWD. Additionally, the W3C staff will watch
> for drafts being published and keep the W3C validator up to date as appropriate.
[1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html#plan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 15:19:04 UTC