- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:23:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21855 --- Comment #9 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> --- (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #8) What I meant was to propose that there is no such thing as a "shared" key, except perhaps during the acquisition as an optimization (skipping PENDING). I don't think there is anything to prevent implementations being smarter if they want but note that firing keymessage at multiple sessions _will_ result in multiple connections to the license service. I don't think the spec should do anything explicitly to describe how to manage this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 14:23:22 UTC