- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:18:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17750 --- Comment #12 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> --- (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #11) > (In reply to Adrian Bateman [MSFT] from comment #10) > > (In reply to David Dorwin from comment #9) > > > Should we be more explicit about close() being a hint in the proposal in > > > comment #8? > > > > I don't think we can be. I wonder if we can start with saying there are no > > guarantees and see if we run into implementation problems? Are there > > specific guarantees you are looking for? > > I meant, should we explicitly note that close() is just a hint - that is, it > will not necessarily destroy keys or result in a closed event? (I think > we're in agreement that this is the intended/possible behavior.) This might > be helpful for readers who might otherwise assume that close() will destroy > keys immediately. Got it. Yes, we should. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 14:18:50 UTC