- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:16:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23490 --- Comment #14 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Romain Deltour from comment #9) > Although I appreciate that a "should" may have a positive impact on > sectionarrhea, I confirm Jukka's stand that heading-less sections are > heavily used in digital publishing (e.g. EPUB) – as I already commented last > March on twitter [1], reported by Robin [2]. > > Would it make sense to reduce the confusion by explicitly mentioning > legitimate use cases for heading-less sections, either via prose or examples > ? > > Additionally, is it still a no-go to recommend aria-label as an alternative > to headings in sections ? > > [1] https://twitter.com/rdeltour/status/314739301676113920 > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Mar/0143.html the ePub accessibility guide contains good advice on section http://www.idpf.org/accessibility/guidelines/content/about.php, lets look at how we can incorporate a reference to it to clarify requirements around use of hx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 09:16:22 UTC