- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:42:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23490
Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rdeltour@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com> ---
Although I appreciate that a "should" may have a positive impact on
sectionarrhea, I confirm Jukka's stand that heading-less sections are heavily
used in digital publishing (e.g. EPUB) – as I already commented last March on
twitter [1], reported by Robin [2].
Would it make sense to reduce the confusion by explicitly mentioning legitimate
use cases for heading-less sections, either via prose or examples ?
Additionally, is it still a no-go to recommend aria-label as an alternative to
headings in sections ?
[1] https://twitter.com/rdeltour/status/314739301676113920
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Mar/0143.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 October 2013 21:42:30 UTC