- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:09:51 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22909
--- Comment #8 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> ---
The proposal claims the section is non-normative but uses normative RFC 2119
words ("must"). Is there a reason why the section cannot be normative? If there
is, any chance of phrasing the text is not to use RFC 2119 words?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2013 09:09:53 UTC