- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:07:05 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17750 --- Comment #18 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- Looks good to me. This addresses the use-case and part of bug 17199. I think release() is a good name, with the semantics that (shared keys aside) all copies of the key (in memory and in storage) are destroyed. For shared keys, we could be explicit that the key is destroyed when all sessions associated with the key are released. The remaining issue in 17199 is how to deal with sessions that were destroyed due to windows closing etc. before having the chance to go through the release() -> PENDING -> update() -> CLOSED sequence. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2013 06:07:06 UTC