- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 04:09:04 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21431 --- Comment #4 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > 5. I believe multiple cues starting at the same timestamp are allowed in a > > > single text track. If so, should overlaps at that timestamp remove all the > > > cues at the timestamp or should there be special rules that allow targetting > > > individual cues? > > > > What overlaps are you referring to? Such as: segment overlaps and the cues > > being delivered twice? IMHO, all we need to make sure is that cues have a > > unique identifier and when delivered twice don't get added to the list of > > TextTrackCues for rendering. The server then has to make sure to provide the > > same identifier for the same cue in any segmentation. > > Keep in mind that a cue's identifier might be the empty string and if not an > empty string, does not need to be unique. So, it is permissible to have two > cues in a text track list that have an empty string as identifier and share > the same start and end times. Right, I was talking about a block identifier inside the video file format that identifies a cue uniquely for that stream and is transmitted to the other end. The identifier in the TextTrackCue object on the HTML level would certainly not be sufficient. Is something like a block identifier used in WebM or MPEG? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 04:09:05 UTC