- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 01:28:27 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21431 Bug ID: 21431 Summary: Specify splicing behavior for text tracks Classification: Unclassified Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Media Source Extensions Assignee: adrianba@microsoft.com Reporter: acolwell@google.com QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-media@w3.org I just realized that the spec has no text about how splicing text tracks should work. I need to review the algorithms a little more, but I believe that they might behave in suprising ways with particularly long cues. Here are some initial questions that I think need to be answered: 1. If a media segment with cues overlaps existing cues in the source buffer what should happen? 2. Should existing cues in the SourceBuffer that are overlapped by cues in the beginning of a new media segment get truncated? 3. If an existing cue spans the entire new media segment, does get split into pieces or just stay visible for the whole period? 4. Do text cues have dependencies like video frames do? 5. I believe multiple cues starting at the same timestamp are allowed in a single text track. If so, should overlaps at that timestamp remove all the cues at the timestamp or should there be special rules that allow targetting individual cues? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 01:28:28 UTC