- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:22:11 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21302 Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |watsonm@netflix.com --- Comment #1 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to comment #0) > > Fragmenting a 30s advert would seem to be unnecessary. > On this one point, adaptive streaming requires that the client has the opportunity to switch bitrate. In practice a granularity (fragment size) of 2 seconds works well. In this case it is certainly necessary to fragment a 30s advert. > >In my opinion the ad's should just be remuxed to fragmented form as part of the ingest process. Tools like GPAC<http://gpac.wp.mines-telecom.fr/> make this super easy. > > The broadcasters that we are working with have a requirement to be able to > re-use their existing web advertising infrastructure as-is. Any changes that > have to be made for a particular platform will either delay or reduce the > probability of them providing content to that platform. It seems like the adverts in question need to be processed anyway to support adaptive streaming. If adaptive streaming is not required, why use Media Source at all ? Why not just use a separate video element to play the advert ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 March 2013 15:22:12 UTC