- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:13:46 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21302 --- Comment #2 from oipfjon@gmail.com --- > If adaptive streaming is not required, why use Media Source at all ? Why not > just use a separate video element to play the advert ? The broadcasters want the transition from the main content item to the adverts and back again to be as seamless as possible. (There's a long debate in progress in various places about how seamless is possible and how the content must be prepared/constrained to achieve that.) Use of two video elements has been discussed extensively in the workshops of the 3 organisations as one of the options. However just starting the 2nd video element from JS based on polling for the advert insertion time or use of media fragment URI with an end time was believed to be a long way removed from seamless without some new APIs to somehow link the two video elements together so that the UA (platform) automatically started the 2nd at the end of the content in the 1st without an JS in the critical path. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 16 March 2013 15:13:47 UTC