[Bug 22586] label element that does not label a control is currently conforming

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22586

--- Comment #11 from Ben Buchanan <7xnm24bdza@snkmail.com> ---
Oops, guess I haven't been paying attention then ;) OK, with that in mind the
code example with secondary label does make sense and could be considered
either conforming, or potentially a warning. 

As a pattern I'd also want to consider the case where that example had a third
bit of information to deal with, eg. explaining an error/invalid state. Would
you add to the description? Use an alert or status?

>From an author's point of view I do think I should mention I've rarely used the
"wrap label around control" pattern. It just isn't as flexible for rendering
and layout as separate elements linked with for.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 6 July 2013 13:26:10 UTC