- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:27:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22586 --- Comment #10 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #9) > ARIA validation would definitely be useful :) I'd happily see ARIA rolled > into the validator, personally. Raw HTML5 doesn't cut it for most modern > sites and apps. ARIA validation is already in the validator: http://validator.w3.org/nu/ it validates the rules as per http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/dom.html#sec-strong-native-semantics & http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/dom.html#sec-implicit-aria-semantics -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 6 July 2013 11:27:36 UTC