- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:35:03 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21144 Bug ID: 21144 Summary: Unified solution for <picture> element Classification: Unclassified Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Adaptive Image Element Assignee: mat@matmarquis.com Reporter: nathanael.jones@gmail.com QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org A Unified solution to <picture> Perhaps there's a very simple way to support both pre- and post-layout queries with <picture>, and sacrifice neither functionality or performance. If sources specify the dimensions of the images (and more than one image matches the media queries), we delay image fetching until CSS is downloaded; otherwise fetching can occur immediately. We can then apply sizing constraints to further filter the list of images (media queries are still king, but if more than 1 image 'matches', we use size constraints). I've written up the details here: https://gist.github.com/nathanaeljones/5047077 --- I also propose the expansion of the Use Cases and Requirements document to include: 11 The solution SHOULD offer an method to leverage breakpoints defined in CSS. 12. The solution SHOULD support a simplified syntax to support primary use case 3.1 (preferably a list of images and their dimensions), in order to reach users of content management systems and those without detailed knowledge of CSS media queries. This allows complexity to be moved from HTML to CSS, and removes the need for high-volume repetition of breakpoint logic. Authors who wish to use responsive web design will be able to use a CSS framework or snippet and matching CSS classes on <picture> to achieve responsive images - a path much less intimidating than CSS media queries, and much easier for CMSes and authoring tools to support (how would a GUI for media queries be designed)? I fear for adoption of <picture> unless we can make it CMS and 'non-coder' friendly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 12:35:08 UTC