- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:40:22 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21104 --- Comment #7 from Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com> --- (In reply to comment #6) > Discussed on the telcon: > http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-html-media-minutes.html > > The task force does not believe there needs to be a technical distinction > between the level of protection provided by a CDM. This is a judgement for > the content owner. > > The privacy issue can be discussed as part of bug 20965, etc. This was just a good faith effort to try and reach some consensus on definitions that could in turn allow further discussion of many issues. Closing this bug amounts to a refusal to consider all implications of EME that are differentiated by the 'level of protection' that the CDM dictates, and can hardly be considered an act of good faith. People technically competent in this area would know that the 'level of protection' has a signification impact on the openness of a platform using EME, the dependence on patented technology, and the security and privacy implications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 23:40:23 UTC