- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:38:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20961 --- Comment #9 from Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com> --- (In reply to comment #8) > Discussed in the telcon. Resolved Won't Fix. > http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-html-media-minutes.html > > As Mark notes, EME does not depend on any such privileged access. CDMs by > design are out of scope for this document. If someone wants to design a > different solution to protected content that doesn't push CDMs out of scope > they are welcome to. The bug does not claim that the EME API alone depends on privileged access, but rather the dependent CDMs. The EME specification already constrains the CDM, and people competent in this area would know that the main use case for the EME specification will require privileged access to the users computer to prevent them from accessing the decoded data. The refusal to address this bug raises a concern about the competence of task force or that they are acting in good faith. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 23:38:10 UTC