- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:37:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20960 --- Comment #13 from Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com> --- (In reply to comment #12) > Discussed in the telcon. Resolved Won't Fix. > http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-html-media-minutes.html > > We believe that the spec is as constrained to the HTMLMediaElement as it can > be. The beginning of the abstract says: "This proposal extends > HTMLMediaElement providing APIs to control playback of protected content." > We don't believe there is any text that can be further added to the spec to > constrain what implementers can code into their user agents. Clearly the EME specification text can be tightened to exclude content outside video and audio. For trivial example: "This proposal extends HTMLMediaElement providing APIs to control playback of ONLY protected VIDEO and AUDIO content." There may well be technical restrictions that would be applicable. For example, for content requiring only a low level of protection it is likely possible to limit the back channel. The CDM could also be sandboxed to provide protection. Closing this bug at this point hardly shows a good faith effort to address the matter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 23:37:38 UTC