- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:51:22 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24047 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-i | |ua.no --- Comment #1 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> --- The phrase ”non-normative“ is standard vocabulary in w3c specs. For instance the ReSpec spec production tool inserts the phrase “This section is non-normative“ just beneath the heading of sections that are not normative. Thus I don't believe in finding a synonym. But it *is* confusing that the spec _begins_ with the words «everything in this spec is non-normative» as this begs the question “so why should I read this document?“ I think it would be less confusing if it was possible to make a more positive statement, first, like so:: «Everything in this specification is normative ….» And then to end with the exeptions: “ ... except when otherwise stated”. Or, to perhaps lean towards the “synonym” solution could be to focus on the word “Conformance“ instead of focusing on (non-)normative. E.g. explain which parts of the spec that contains conformance rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 15:51:24 UTC