- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:24:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24047 --- Comment #2 from Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> --- Hi Leif, (In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #1) > The phrase ”non-normative“ is standard vocabulary in w3c specs. For instance > the ReSpec spec production tool inserts the phrase “This section is > non-normative“ just beneath the heading of sections that are not normative. > > Thus I don't believe in finding a synonym. Yes, the terms are standard vocabulary in W3C specs. But they are not defined anywhere that I can find (except the EOWG draft), which presents the problem as it states that doc is not to be cited. > But it *is* confusing that the spec _begins_ with the words «everything in > this spec is non-normative» as this begs the question “so why should I read > this document?“ Yes it had exactly that affect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 16:24:10 UTC