- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:00:03 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22996 --- Comment #9 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> --- (In reply to comment #5) > the spec says: [ snip ] > 'its nearest ancestor ... sectioning root element'. > > I don't see why any change would need to be made to <footer. to make it > suitable for its use as a container for citation information, the only > change would be to the definition of blockquote. However, the spec uses the exact same wording ("nearest ancestor … sectioning root element" etc) about <header> and <h1>-<h6> elements as well. So, when arguing based on what the spec says, we could also say that no change is needed for <h1>-<h6> and <header> - they can all be used to “talk about” the quotation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 19 August 2013 11:00:05 UTC