- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:36:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22996 --- Comment #8 from heydon <heydon@heydonworks.com> --- (In reply to comment #7) > I have done some digging: > > I have made some data available: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/377471/html5bq/index.html > > This is an index of 318 pages which use the HTML5 doctype and include > blockquote elements (and sometimes cite elements). The sample pages were > drawn from the raw data from March 2012 (121Mb > http://webdevdata.org/data/data.zip). Consisting of approximately 8000 home > pages from the top 10,000 most popular web sites. > > I have added styles to blockquote and cite elements so that they are easily > identifiable when viewing the page. > > There is also grep output for the indexed pages: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/377471/blockquote.html > > > observations: > > blockquote usage from these pages appears to be largely for its intended > use. > it is common for the attribution to be included within the blockquote > when <cite> is used it is common for it to be included inside the > blockquote element > when <cite> is used it is common for it to be used for attributing a > quote to a person > 10 pages included use of the cite attribute > 5 pages used footer inside blockquote for attribution Thank you, Steve, that's great. Just looking at the grep, I'm seeing uses of <cite> in <footer> as well as just <footer>. Some of the more cautious appear to be using things like the below example <p id="quote-source"> Dan Salvador, CEO, Mainline </p> Obviously, this is suboptimal and precisely the kind of thing that authors should feel they can avoid (as addressed by this bug). :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 19 August 2013 09:36:37 UTC