- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:54:36 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19021 Summary: A single manifest file pre page will be problematic for web authoring programmers like myself, and Lib developers like jQuery. It will cause all types of problems with mash-ups of various providers of web apps on a single page. Can U please consider addin Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#off line OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org This was was cloned from bug 10206 as part of operation LATER convergence. Originally filed: 2010-07-20 06:09:00 +0000 ================================================================================ #0 contributor@whatwg.org 2010-07-20 06:09:05 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#offline Comment: A single manifest file pre page will be problematic for web authoring programmers like myself, and Lib developers like jQuery. It will cause all types of problems with mash-ups of various providers of web apps on a single page. Can U please consider adding to the HTML5 spec the ability to allow for more than one manifest file per page. It could follow the same logic of using multi css files. (filed for Robert Stack) Posted from: 98.248.33.53 by ian@hixie.ch ================================================================================ #1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-09-08 06:44:03 +0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seems like a reasonable thing to consider for v2, if we decide the manifest feature is worth keeping. In the meantime, you can work around this using iframes, I believe. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Marking LATER for now, as per comments above. ================================================================================ -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 21:54:37 UTC