- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:53:39 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11204 --- Comment #48 from Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com> 2012-09-20 19:53:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #47) > (In reply to comment #46) > > (In reply to comment #45) > > > Alright, I can't in good conscious leave the ref to a 404: > > > (http://www.w3.org/TBD) > > > > Your conscience is not relevant in this process. The WG has decided on a 404. > > As an editor in the HTML WG, your job is do apply whatever ridiculous decisions > > the WG makes. I repeat my Formal Objection to your change. > > > I'm not sure where this TBD reference is? I looked at the change proposal > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/Reference_a_W3C_version_of_DOM_Parsing_and_Serialization > > and it just says > > Publish DOM Parsing and Serialization as currently defined at > http://html5.org/specs/dom-parsing.html in the HTML WG. Then update the current > DOM Parsing and Serialization reference in HTML5 to point to the new spec. > > which appears to be what is being done. Any reference to "TBD" that does exist > is clearly intended as a meta-variable to be filled in To-Be-Decided. The > document can not be published anyway with a 404 link as that's clearly against > pubrules. It says <del>[http://html5.org/specs/dom-parsing.html DOM Parsing and Serialization], Ms2ger. html5.org.</del> <ins>[http://www.w3.org/TBD DOM Parsing and Serialization], Ms2ger. W3C.</ins> If this is in disagreement with pubrules, that's unfortunate, but it doesn't allow the editor to override a clear WG decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 19:53:40 UTC