- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:41:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13359 --- Comment #64 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2012-09-07 19:41:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #61) > (In reply to comment #59) > > Wouldn't the page know what the format was? After all, it was the one that gave > > the URL. > > I assume this is a reply t o comment #56. > > In the case where the URL is specified in the video element, the page author > would need to use different versions of the JS dispatch function depending on > the media type of the content pointed to by the URL. Will the author always be > able to make this association? Since it's the author providing the URL, he should know the media type of the content behind the URL. Can you explain a situation where that wouldn't be the case? > What about in a dynamically created page where > the only piece of information about the content is the URL? Even then the page author is the one writing the JS, so they would know. > Also, wouldn't this be a source of errors? The metadata available to the page > author might be wrong, saying that a piece of content is Ogg when in fact it is > WebM. A UA that supports both will play the content but the wrong dispatch > function will be used. If the author doesn't know the media type/can't find out through probing, why would the browser get it right? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 19:41:36 UTC