- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:52:51 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18744 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faulkner.steve@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2012-09-06 14:52:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Currently, the spec says > > > User Agents are encouraged to expose the full semantics of hidden > > elements to Assistive Technology when such elements are referenced > > from WAI-ARIA attributes such as aria-describedby. > > Instead of specifically referring to WAI-ARIA here, we could generalize > this encouragement to other such cases. Something like this maybe: > > > When a hidden="" element is related to another element by ID reference > > (e.g. with aria-describedby=""), User Agents are encouraged to expose > > the full semantics of the hidden="" element to Assistive Technology. > > This might help alleviate PF's concern that HTML5 unduly specifies > changes to WAI-ARIA in this clause. I would suggest that if the "(e.g. with aria-describedby="")" was removed and replaced with a native HTML example: e.g. <label for="test" style="display:none">label</label> <input type="text" id="test"> Then the jurisdiction issue would be removed, as the for attribute is defined in HTML -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 14:52:59 UTC