- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:43:36 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17298 --- Comment #12 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2012-09-05 17:43:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > The proposal is to change (back) what's conforming (valid) to what HTML 4 said > > (or a superset of that). > > > > It is *not* about changing the processing requirements. > > And I found your argument to do that to be groundless in practice, as I clearly > explained. If you wish to keep this bug open, please provide new arguments or a > clear explanation of why I may be wrong. Without that, there is really no point > in reopening. The reason is that people who *do* care about conformance will get a warning when they use identifiers that may become problematic in the future; which is exactly the reason why we distinguish between things that are conforming and those which happen to work anyway, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 17:43:37 UTC