- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:12:58 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-19741-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19741
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 19741
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Assignee: erika.doyle@microsoft.com
Summary: Wrong advice on headings should be removed
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
Reporter: chaals@yandex-team.ru
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Version: unspecified
Component: HTML5 spec
Product: HTML WG
in
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/headings-and-sections.html#headings-and-sections
there is a non-normative statement suggesting authors prefer the use of
sections and repeated h1 elements over the use of the odler numbered headings.
This is in conflict with the statement at the end of
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-aside-element.html#the-h1,-h2,-h3,-h4,-h5,-and-h6-elements
that authors should choose what suits them.
It is clearly bad advice in the absence of the outline algorithm working, and
even were that widely implemented it breaks backward compatibility.
It is not clear that the value of this advice justifies this cost in theory,
and it is clear that in the current situation there is little value and high
cost.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 21:12:59 UTC