- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:12:58 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-19741-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19741 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 19741 CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Assignee: erika.doyle@microsoft.com Summary: Wrong advice on headings should be removed QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: chaals@yandex-team.ru Hardware: PC Status: NEW Version: unspecified Component: HTML5 spec Product: HTML WG in http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/headings-and-sections.html#headings-and-sections there is a non-normative statement suggesting authors prefer the use of sections and repeated h1 elements over the use of the odler numbered headings. This is in conflict with the statement at the end of http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-aside-element.html#the-h1,-h2,-h3,-h4,-h5,-and-h6-elements that authors should choose what suits them. It is clearly bad advice in the absence of the outline algorithm working, and even were that widely implemented it breaks backward compatibility. It is not clear that the value of this advice justifies this cost in theory, and it is clear that in the current situation there is little value and high cost. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 21:12:59 UTC