- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:55:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-17684-2486-sKjOrQQcL8@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17684 --- Comment #5 from theimp@iinet.net.au --- I do not think that this is a satisfactory response. It is of course the spec. writer's prerogative as to when and which bugs are resolved, but as stated, the spec. is contradictory and therefore unimplementable as currently written. Any one of the many obvious solutions (most of which are semantic and not technical) would serve well enough for now, even if they are not ideal in the long term. However, I disagree strongly with not addressing this in any way at this stage, because the current state benefits no-one. There is already evidence that, for example, validator user agents have completely refused to implement the contents of the wiki in any way, and this bug is one of many reasons why (along with other issues such as the spontaneity of updates to the wiki, and the unavailability of the wiki content as machine-readable output). As it is already unimplemented, and there is both observed and documented dissatisfaction with the current state of the spec. by vendors, in respect of this bug, I do not think that "deal with it in the indefinite future" is acceptable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 11:55:22 UTC