- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:19:47 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-18642-2486-qJuybRF88C@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18642 Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|adrianba@microsoft.com |acolwell@chromium.org --- Comment #10 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> --- Issues identified here: 1. The text needs to be reworked so people don't think that the bytestream is being rewritten in place. 2. Timestamp rollover behavior needs to be clarified. I believe the concensus was that rollover within a media segment must be handled, but it is up to the application to handle it across media segments via timestampOffset. 3. Conversion from bytestream timestamp to presentation timestamp double needs clarification. Next Action: Reorganize append() algorithm into several sub-algorithms so that there are logical places to put the clarifications mentioned above. Several open issues require this. Assigned to Aaron. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2012 16:19:48 UTC