- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:41:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19925 Larry Masinter <lmm@acm.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmm@acm.org --- Comment #7 from Larry Masinter <lmm@acm.org> --- I like the current title containing "XHTML", and I think HTML/XHTML Compatibility Authoring Guide is exactly what people will look for. If you want to be clearer about the scope of applicability of the document, I think it's more appropriate to do it in the text of the document. The Abstract is actually more clear about the scope of the recommendations made than the Introduction is, and copying some of the abstract text into the Introduction (and explicitly labeling it Scope, perhaps) might help clarify why this document is intended as a normative recommendation for a narrow range of applications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 17:41:02 UTC