- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:39:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19923 --- Comment #2 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> --- (In reply to comment #1) > A recommendation to use utf-8 is a concrete counter example to both of these > claims. Failure to pursue other bugs should not be considered to invalidate bugs that are pursued. > Henri further claims that "The HTML5 specification already normatively > defines the conformance criteria for all of the features employed in both > serialisations.". I believe that the conformance criteria specified in that > document is incomplete and that the Polyglot document seeks to correct that, > and can therefore be considered an extension specification: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html#extension-specs I object to Polyglot Markup being framed as an Extension Specification. If conformance of either the text/html or the application/xhtml+xml is not fully defined, such a lack of detail should be fixed in the upstream WHATWG spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 13:39:33 UTC