- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:10:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19925 --- Comment #1 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> --- (In reply to comment #0) > Note: this is just a suggestion, feel free to dispose of it as you wish. The proposal to drop "XHTML" from the title is only a "bikeshedding" type of thing, right? (I.e. you don't propose that XHTML-compatibility becomes optional. That is: you don't propose that "closing tags" is enough.) If one drops it from the title, then one might need to add it elsewhere. It would be good if you proposed a full alternative title - as is, it is not enough to just drop "XHTML". And I must say that I don't quite see the benefit of dropping it. Regarding "profile", then I have always seen this a profile. So I am only favor of making that aspect stronger. IN that regard, then I have always reacted to the "guidelines" description found in the list of "Editor's drafts": http://www.w3.org/html/wg/#current I would also like to suggest that the intro describes polyglot markup as a single syntax that authoring tools could implement - as alternative to two syntaxes, XHTML5 and HTML5. Something which has the potential of simplifying things for users of such authoring tools. I feel that most of what you say are things we have thought about when working with this spec. But I agree that it could be good to describe the advantages better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 22:10:38 UTC