- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:41:49 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14702 --- Comment #31 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2012-01-28 22:41:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) > I've gotten very clear feedback that the automagic caching of master-entries is > often not desirable. I'd like to see that feedback addressed as well. Please file separate bugs for separate issues. (In reply to comment #29) > We (Microsoft) were asked by our partners and our web properties to expand the > use of AppCache beyond offline scenarios. These web properties were not > interested in providing offline capabilities to their customers but rather > deliver content quickly to them. Sites that are not interested in working offline have nothing to do with appcache. Appcache can't make them any faster than HTTP caching, regardless of how we change it (certainly within the context of this bug), as described in comment 20. (In reply to comment #30) > > The relevant use-case for this bug report is #2 "Make a blog work offline": [...] Does the proposal in comment 27 address this satisfactorily? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 22:41:50 UTC