- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:15:03 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15705 Summary: There is already a perfectly good standard for datetimes: ISO 8601. Why are you reinventing something that works? Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#glo bal-dates-and-times OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Hixie drafts (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-microsyntaxes.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#global-dates-and-times Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#global-dates-and-times Comment: There is already a perfectly good standard for datetimes: ISO 8601. Why are you reinventing something that works? Posted from: 150.101.237.208 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_2) AppleWebKit/534.52.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.2 Safari/534.52.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 06:15:06 UTC