- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:15:03 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15705
Summary: There is already a perfectly good standard for
datetimes: ISO 8601. Why are you reinventing something
that works?
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#glo
bal-dates-and-times
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other Hixie drafts (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org
Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-microsyntaxes.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#global-dates-and-times
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#global-dates-and-times
Comment:
There is already a perfectly good standard for datetimes: ISO 8601. Why are
you reinventing something that works?
Posted from: 150.101.237.208
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_2) AppleWebKit/534.52.7
(KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.2 Safari/534.52.7
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 06:15:06 UTC